Cases 81 - 90 of 506
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilburn v. Ronkins
as 4:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Ralph Richard Hilburn, II
Respondent:
William Ronkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laffoon v. Bridges et al
as 5:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Laffoon
Defendant:
Carrie Bridges, Kevin Stitt and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv00406
Petitioner:
Antonio Garcia Ellis
Respondent:
William Rankins, Scott Crow and Chris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Levick et al
as 5:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jordan Trevon Williams
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Altus City of and Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Oklahoma County Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center, Turn Key Health, FNU Winchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nobles v. Rankins
as 5:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Kerry Ryan Nobles
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Nathan K Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Betty Guffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Weaver et al
as 5:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
John James Williams
Defendant:
FNU Weaver, Warden Luke Pettigrew, Joseph Harp Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
