Cases 81 - 90 of 10,881
Loftis v. Conway
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Cody Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center
as 5:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Alexis DeJesus
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Carter County Detention Center, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downey v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Johnie D Downey
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston, Aaron J Livingston doing business as Gtwo also known as Clarke and Clarke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Tulsa Police Department and Police/Fire/Emergency Dispatch - 911
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle-Giles v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs v. USA
as 4:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Andrew Gibbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Christian v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00353
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Cornelius Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
