Cases 81 - 90 of 10,134
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Robert D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Crawley
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Sandy Whitbread, Dana Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Blanton et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hudson
Defendant:
Officer Blanton, Officer Huerta and SHU Lt. Roughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lachat v. Hendricks
as 6:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Lachat
Respondent:
Kimberly Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipska v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Lipska and Christopher Ray Hare
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Ally et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dontonio King
Defendant:
Sgt. Ally, Ofc. J. Verity, Ofc. Bourdain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00389
Petitioner:
Jonatan Gutierrez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Amado Pacheco
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wasson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
John M. Wasson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
