Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01605
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17538
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL JEAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOE BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2020cv14883
Petitioner:
JOE SIMMONS
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STOKES v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv20601
Defendant:
CAPT. CANBE, LISA STRECKER, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STOKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITTON v. CITY OF ATLANTIC et al
as 1:2018cv09263
Plaintiff:
LONNIE BRITTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC, THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, YOLANDA SHABAZZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITTON v. CITY OF ATLANTIC et al
as 1:2017cv01986
Plaintiff:
LONNIE BRITTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC, YOLANDA SHABAZZ, STEPHEN RANDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANNERS v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAY et al
as 1:2016cv01686
Plaintiff:
JOE HANNERS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL PROVIDER, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAKES, JR. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv01607
Petitioner:
RICKIE JOE RAKES, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUDABUSH v. BUMB et al
as 3:2015cv06554
Petitioner:
JAMES ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C.E. SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOYLE v. BATTEN et al
as 1:2015cv02916
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOYLE
Defendant:
RAYMOND A. BATTEN, SAVERIO M. CARROCCIA, DOUG OSMANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
