Cases 1 - 10 of 18,994
PEGUERO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07080
Petitioner:
JOSE MATOS PEGUERO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
REYES v. R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07052
Petitioner:
MARTIN REYES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERALTA-ROSARIO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07038
Petitioner:
DAVID PERALTA-ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTINEZ POLANCO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2024cv07005
Petitioner:
HILARIO MARTINEZ-POLANCO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOQUETE-PEREZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07006
Petitioner:
EVANGELISTA MOQUETE-PEREZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AKINMADEYEMI v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07003
Petitioner:
AKINTOLA AKINMADEYEMI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEWART v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06917
Petitioner:
ROSHAWN STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILKINS v. DEGNER
as 1:2024cv06999
Plaintiff:
KHALIL WILKINS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
