Cases 1 - 10 of 17,837
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Dale v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00692
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Dale
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Shasta Burton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Glaser et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela J. Glaser, Maria Christine Palermo and Michelle Agresta Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03215
Petitioner:
DEONDRE E. SMITH
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, GEORGE WHARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03219
Petitioner:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Respondent:
BEAU D. WENGER, David C Young, COLIN E. PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPEIGHTS JR. v. NOBLE et al
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
ERIC A. SPEIGHTS JR.
Respondent:
ANDRIA NOBLE, JARED STRUBEL and EMILY ANSTAETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Defendant:
BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith, David C Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelms v. USA
as 2:2024cv03218
Defendant:
Shawn T Nelms
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
