Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franklin v. Lake County Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Michael Franklin
Defendant:
Lake County Ohio, Cpt Cynthia Brooks, K. Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martinez-Palacios v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Ernesto Martinez-Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Warden Garza and Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv02227
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez and Nicholas Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
as 2:2022cv02890
Petitioner:
Marvin Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson and Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Marvin Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez, Jr. v. Lucas County Jail
as 3:2021cv01900
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Lucas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Cervantes, et al v. Phillips, et al
as 4:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Julian Aragon Cervantes, Nathan Parker and Silvestre Martinez
Defendant:
Warden Michael Phillips, Core Civic and the Individual Contractors and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Williams
as 4:2021cv00245
Petitioner:
Richard Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Mark K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. USA
as 4:2020cv02800
Petitioner:
Frank Martinez, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
