Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Cisse v. Hill et al
as 6:2023cv06575
Plaintiff:
Ali Cisse
Defendant:
G. Hill, S. Carpenter, D. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv06657
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Detective Jeffrey Carroll, Police Officer Frank Feliciano, Narcotics Det. 25th John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv05491
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Jeffrey Carroll, Frank Feliciano, John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cano v. City of New York (NYCDOC) et al
as 1:2023cv03807
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hiram Cano
Defendant:
City of New York (NYCDOC), Patricia Yang, Michael Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Donahue et al
as 6:2022cv06559
Plaintiff:
Frederick Diaz
Defendant:
James F. Donahue, Christopher Yehl, Timothy J. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. NYC Dept. of Corrections Medical Depts.
as 1:2022cv09561
Plaintiff:
Carroll Lassiter
Defendant:
NYC Dept. of Corrections Medical Depts.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Farrell et al
as 1:2022cv01785
Plaintiff:
George Marks
Defendant:
Richard K. Farrell and John C. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher v. Chappius et al
as 6:2020cv06330
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Plaintiff:
Johnson Christopher and Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chappius et al
as 1:2020cv00604
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hundley v. Frunzi et al
as 6:2020cv06150
Defendant:
B. O'Rourke, R. Snyder, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Crushaun Hundley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
