Cases 1 - 10 of 187
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCDANIEL v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
ECHO LINDSEY MCDANIEL
Respondent:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and DEPUTY SHERIFF THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
DAVID C HARRIS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN v. PAULK
as 7:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. CHAPMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Defendant:
RICHARD CHAPMAN, CAPTAIN BUSTER KING and NURSE TINA DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
