Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Marks et al
as 3:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Doyle Bingham
Defendant:
Marks, Parks, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. State of Nevada
as 3:2023cv00437
Petitioner:
Brett Doyle
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brett Doyle
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Scott Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2019cv00725
Plaintiff:
Brett Doyle
Defendant:
Nevada, State of, Harold Wickham, Renee Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2018cv02085
Respondent:
Joseph Michael Lombardo, Robert T. Doyle and Edward S. Berberian, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jose Cesar Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Washoe County Jail
as 3:2018cv00352
Defendant:
Washoe County Jail
Plaintiff:
Doyle Wade Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bundy v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv01551
Respondent:
Nadia Ahmed, Erin Creegan, Doyle Decker and others
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lancaster v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2013cv00632
Petitioner:
Doyle Dolen Lancaster
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
