Cases 1 - 10 of 420
(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Servin, S. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff
as 2:2024cv02241
Petitioner:
Roberto Herrera
Respondent:
CDCR Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Cavazos v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Defendant:
C. Hernandez, Angelo, Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrece Jefferson v. J. Herrera et al
as 2:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
J. Herrera, J. Rizofuentez and Z. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jefferson v. Herrera et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
J. Herrera, J. Rizofuentez and Z. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gallegos v. Bruce et al
as 2:2023cv02964
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
Gladden Bruce, Jorge Gonzalez, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon Abel Gonzalez v. Juan Herrera et al
as 2:2023cv10554
Petitioner:
Leon Abel Gonzalez
Respondent:
Juan Herrera and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Matthew David Herrera v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 8:2023cv02327
Petitioner:
Matthew David Herrera
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Kingdom v. Herrera
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Miltonous Q. Kingdom
Defendant:
G. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff et al
as 2:2023cv03103
Petitioner:
Roberto Herrera
Respondent:
CDCR Staff and S. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
