Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Davis (PS) v. Pippin et al
as 1:2024cv02197
Defendant:
Issac Conley, Malek Brewer, Juan Lemones Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan (PS) v. Reid et al
as 1:2024cv02074
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Jordan
Defendant:
Reid, Diggens, Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallegos (PS) v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Raul Gallegos
Defendant:
Jordan Smith, ACSO and ACDF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Brady et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Jenna Kruszka, Catherine Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stetzel (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv03432
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Hannah Feldhacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begaye (PS) v. Jacques et al
as 1:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Derrick Begaye
Defendant:
Terry Jacques, Kelly Layton, Jordan Verers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Gregory
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Jordan Jackson Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Gregory
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Jordan Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. United States Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv03317
Petitioner:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
United States Dept. of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, E. Conorer and Ausp Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jordan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv03274
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
