Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Smith v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Gerald K Smith
Defendant:
D. Hogan, Warden Norman Robinson, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pryor v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 4:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Nc LaFonse Pryor and Norman LaFonte Pryor
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lieutinent Arianna Brock, M. Darkangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feaster v. Sammons et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Walter Sammons, Officer Norman, Officer Carver R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Norman Harvey and Norman F. Harvey
Defendant:
Jennifer Gillece Black, Annette Chambers-Smith, Mr. Gerren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doogs v. Robinson
as 3:2021cv00906
Petitioner:
Ronald J. Doogs
Respondent:
Warden Norman Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pryor v. Erdos
as 5:2020cv02863
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Petitioner:
Norman Pryor, Norman LaFonte Pryor and Nc LaFonse Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
