Cases 1 - 10 of 50
POPE v. GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE POPE
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Nathan J. Davis
Defendant:
Lane, V. Pope-Jones and Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Young, Walker and Pope Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. SCHIOFMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C E RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nabeack v. Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv14499
Plaintiff:
Austin Nabeack
Defendant:
William Snyder, Burke, Grose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FERGUSON v. INCH et al
as 5:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN DAVID FERGUSON
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, LESTER FERNANDEZ, SUMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LoRusso v. Gulfport Police Department et al
as 8:2021cv02253
Petitioner:
Michael LoRusso
Respondent:
Gulfport Police Department, Chief of Police, Steve Weatherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Schlofman et al
as 3:2021cv00530
Defendant:
Denis A. Vilchez, Centurion Medical Services, Inc., Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Dale Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LoRusso v. Weatherford et al
as 8:2021cv00309
Defendant:
Alan Weatherford, Tim Carter and Edward Pope
Plaintiff:
Michael LoRusso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Florida State Senate et al
as 2:2020cv14358
Defendant:
Florida Dept Motor Vehicles, Florida Dept of Revenue, Scott Dresser and others
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
