Cases 1 - 10 of 39
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanner v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Alphonso Tarodd Tanner
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKENZIE v. PATTERSON et al
as 4:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON, CASEY T BARREN, BRITTNEY BAXTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Ron DeSantis, Jeffrey R. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvivier v. Knight et al
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Duvivier
Defendant:
Kyle Knight, J. Birdsong, Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY and SKRUBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Dixon et al (Calhoun County)
as 8:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Hewitt A. Grant, II
Defendant:
Thomas Dixon, Ricky Anderson, Douglas Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARD v. DIXON et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALONZO MARQUISE HEARD
Defendant:
R DIXON, C D TANNER, SWAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2021cv04644
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKRUBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TANNER v. INCH
as 3:2021cv00793
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Petitioner:
DAMON TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
