Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Hazel M. Peterson, Sara Beth Collins, Brandon Gitchel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler (ID 45041) v. Skidmore et al
as 5:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Wheeler
Defendant:
James C. Skidmore, (fnu) Godson and Godson Bustrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler (ID 46584) v. Gooch
as 5:2019cv03184
Defendant:
Deanna Gooch
Plaintiff:
Brett D. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neff (ID 63388) v. Winfield Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2019cv03034
Defendant:
(fnu) Fugua, Kansas Department of Corrections, Tyler Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Neff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake et al v. Underwood et al
as 5:2018cv03174
Defendant:
(fnu) McGuire, Winfield Correctional Facility, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ott, Cliff Swarthout, Corey Barfoot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2015cv03034
Plaintiff:
Raudel Morales, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Laura L. Miser, Ty Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2012cv03246
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Cunningham
Defendant:
Ed Wheeler, Steve Opat and Keith Collett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv03051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wheeler v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2008cv03098
Petitioner:
Brett D Wheeler
Respondent:
State of Kansas and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
