Cases 1 - 10 of 203
WITCHARD v. SURAMPUDI et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Defendant:
VIJAYA S. SURAMPUDI, MATTHEW H. SOLOMSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2023cv03118
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, R.K. DELMAR, CAWANA PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
MARTI E. BELL
Defendant:
H. JOYNER, MELVIN, HERLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
CARLOS PARKS
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH and ERIC H. HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03566
Defendant:
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, WILLIAM M. JACKSON, MARY LOU LEARY and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEALS v. USA
as 1:2020cv02820
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. SEALS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SIGLER v. DEVER III et al
as 1:2020cv01865
Defendant:
ARNEATHA A. GILLIS, JAMES C. DEVER III, CHARLES H. HENRY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THEODORE SIGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES, JR. v. PREGERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00710
Defendant:
LEE, XAVIER BECERRA, DEAN PREGERSON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY A. JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
