Cases 1 - 10 of 622
Daniels v. Kotek et al
as 2:2024cv01538
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, Downs, Tina Kotek and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah David Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Hunter et al
as 3:2024cv01437
Defendant:
Washington County, Oregon, Dr. Russell L. Marks, Multnomah County, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. Espinoza et al
as 2:2024cv01247
Defendant:
SGT. Haga, SGT. Moore, C/O Ketchersid and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Anne Marie Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv01168
Petitioner:
Mark Forest Templeton
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere and Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gable v. Ackom et al
as 6:2024cv01131
Defendant:
Karl Nelson, William Pierce, Emil Brandaw and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cardenas v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01007
Defendant:
Thomas Bristol, Dr. Daniel Dewsnup, Benjamin Norton and others
Plaintiff:
Demecio Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Defendant:
C.O. Lay, Ms. Sundquist, Ms. Brun and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassman v. Braun et al
as 6:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Glassman
Defendant:
Mark Braun, Bobbie France, Tina Lovik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Highberger
as 6:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Mark James Wilson
Respondent:
Joshua Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanderhoof v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Mark Allen Vanderhoof
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
