Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davidson v. Well Path et al
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Cannon Davidson
Defendant:
Well Path, Sheriff Craig Owens, Deputy Barnes and others
Not Classified By Court:
Cobb County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. C. Williamson et al
as 1:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
Adolfo Federico Mendoza
Respondent:
Warden C. Williamson and Warden William L. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendoza v. Williamson
as 1:2022cv04011
Petitioner:
Adolfo Federico Mendoza
Respondent:
Warden C. Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Well Path et al
as 1:2022cv03637
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rondey Wilkins
Defendant:
Well Path, Dr. Mendoza and Nurse Felicia Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Georgia Piedmont Technical College et al
as 1:2021cv02660
Defendant:
Georgia Piedmont Technical College, Ms. Byrd, Ms. Mendoza-Guerra and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
