Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00624
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. LEW et al
as 1:2018cv02592
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF F.B.I., POST MASTER GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE U.S. INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAICEDO-OBANDO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv01667
Plaintiff:
CIRO CAICEDO-OBANDO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. PETROSKY, JUAN DELEON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAMING v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant:
J. SIMMONS, MEYER and ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, INTERNAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUANDER v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL QUANDER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, ANSEL, MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
