Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ORTIZ v. YELLEN
as 1:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
RODOLFO ORTIZ
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN and JANET L. YELLEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GRIFFIN v. JAMES et al
as 1:2016cv02275
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH W. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
KENNETH L. JAMES, PEDRO CLAUDIO, RAYMOND L. ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
AMAYA-ORTIZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv02211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOSE A. AMAYA-ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. PRATTER et al
as 1:2015cv00481
Plaintiff:
ELVIS ORTIZ
Defendant:
GENE E.K. PRATTER, MICHAEL E. KUNZ and DAVID E. TROYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff:
LUCIO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01674
Plaintiff:
HERARDO ORTIZ
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
