Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Reed-Jones v. O'Donnell
as 3:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
Aaron Reed-Jones
Respondent:
Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rankin v. Google
as 6:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Google
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik v. Reed College et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Shazad Malik
Defendant:
Reed College, John Young Taft, Kater Murch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Bristol et al
as 6:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
David Boylen Manley
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas L. Bristol, Dr. Michael T. Puerini, Moriam Balogun, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Landers
as 6:2023cv01477
Petitioner:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Respondent:
Sheriff Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crapser et al v. NaphCare, Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald Crapser and Rhonda Burke
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc, Clackamas County, Jill Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankin v. Beutle et al
as 6:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Deputy Page Beutle, Sheriff Landers, Nurse Viola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Damariea Harris
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Reed Paulson, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Beutler
as 6:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Deputy Page Beutler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
