Cases 1 - 10 of 165
BOLDEN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS
as 1:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
DONNELL T. BOLDEN
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01141
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DIXON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Not Classified By Court:
COLETTE S. PETERS
Plaintiff:
DIJON DIXON
Defendant:
EUGENE BAINE, J.C. PETRUCCI, MICHAEL FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
OATMAN v. COLLIER et al
as 1:2022cv03678
Plaintiff:
BRIAN G. OATMAN
Defendant:
MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORPORATION, A OR K RODRIGUEZ, B. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GODBOLT v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2022cv03393
Petitioner:
JAMES A. GODBOLT
Respondent:
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BARTOLI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
ERIC BARTOLI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFFERY M. OLSON, JOHN R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv01049
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COLE, JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
