Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Watkins v. Denver County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv02858
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamont Watkins
Defendant:
Denver County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2016cv01572
Plaintiff:
Allen T. Watkins
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, City of Denver and County of Denver and Denver Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinney v. Young et al
as 1:2014cv02635
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Kinney
Defendant:
Young, Rebecca Oaks, Kimberly Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv01464
Plaintiff:
Allen T. Watkins
Defendant:
State of Colorado, State of California and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Allen T. Watkins
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Tanner, et al
as 1:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Allen Watkins
Defendant:
D. Tanner, T. Vaughan, J. Nitsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Gadberry et al
as 1:2011cv01956
Plaintiff:
Claude Derek Foster
Defendant:
Bonnie Gadberry, Gary Watkins, Tony Carochi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mecham et al v. George et al
as 1:2010cv02269
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Leroy Michael Schweitzer and Luke Ammon of Preacher
Defendant:
J. George, G. Ramirez, G. Bream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. Division of Adult Parole/C.D.O.C
as 1:2010cv00359
Petitioner:
Jamaal Watkins
Respondent:
Division of Adult Parole/C.D.O.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Love et al
as 1:2009cv02042
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Watkins
Defendant:
Nathan Love, Colorado Division of Adult Parole and Community Corr., Atty. for CO Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
