Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Kirk v. Acevedo et al
as 5:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Troy Kirk
Defendant:
FNU Acevedo, Sunshine Stanek, Kelly Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Samuel Il'Lester York, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher Martinez and FNU 5:23-CV-075 Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Herrera v. Wells Fargo Brokerage Services et al
as 4:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Samuel K. Herrera
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Financial Responsibility Department Division, Larry Bensussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Lubbock County et al
as 5:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terrance King
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Well Path Medical Services, Sgt. Tracy Marie Sasin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Hidalgo et al
as 4:2021cv04235
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzales
Defendant:
Lina Hidalgo, Ed Gonzalez, Art Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falcon v. Hopkin et al
as 4:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, Robert Hopkin, State of Texas & Chief of Houston Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Falcon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Flanery et al
as 1:2020cv01217
Defendant:
Justin Flanery, Art Acevedo and Austin Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jeron Deangelo Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Acevedo et al
as 4:2020cv04238
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe No. 1, Houston Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Darnell Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Unger et al
as 4:2020cv03545
Defendant:
Officer Ujumu, Chief Art Acevedo, Judge Hilary Unger and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Acevedo
as 4:2020cv02170
Plaintiff:
Antonio Q McGee
Defendant:
Art Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
