Cases 1 - 10 of 97
BARNES v. GRIFFITH et al
as 1:2023cv03043
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BARNES
Defendant:
HEATHER GRIFFITH and KEISHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2023cv02301
Petitioner:
KELVIN BARNES
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATT PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. FISHER
as 1:2023cv01487
Petitioner:
JAMES A. BARNES
Respondent:
HON. KEVIN T. SMITH and KEISHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARNES v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2022cv07268
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BARNES
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARNES v. ESPOSITO
as 1:2022cv06253
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARNES
Defendant:
KRISTEN ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al.
as 3:2022cv02376
Plaintiff:
Atiba Barnes
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MR. CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv20466
Petitioner:
JAMES BARNES
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and EUGENE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARNES v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2021cv19904
Petitioner:
GABRIEL C. BARNES
Respondent:
JAMES SLAUGHTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARNES v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv12942
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARNES
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, KRISTINA SMITH, JOHN AND JANE DOES #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYES v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv12151
Defendant:
JANE DOE NURSE 2, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICER BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MAYES
3Rd Party Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
