Cases 1 - 10 of 2,024
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Florida (Hendry)
as 2:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Johnson
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. NEWBERN et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY T HILL
Defendant:
E NEWBERN, KIGHT, VAN HOUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Lake County, Joseph A Iozzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar v. Department of Treasury
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar
Defendant:
Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Robinson, Vanerren v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv14159
Plaintiff:
Vanerren E. Robinson and Vandareen E. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden and Z. Culpepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews, R. Bassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange)
as 6:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
James E. Lyons
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
