Cases 1 - 10 of 720
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06864
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff:
MALIK S. JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. FELDER et al
as 1:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. HILL
Defendant:
FELICIA FELDER, JOSEPH E. KRAKORA, PUBLIC DEFENDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv00621
Petitioner:
JEAN E. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WIGGINS v. ISMAN et al
as 1:2023cv22009
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Defendant:
HONORABLE JAMES E. ISMAN, JOHN ZARYCH, ESQ., ELLEN LOUGHNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. LANGE et al
as 1:2023cv21315
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN E. GAINES
Defendant:
HONORABLE PETER LANGE, CHERLY COHEN and TIMOTHY FARROW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv16631
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ELLEN E. LOUGHNEY, ERIC R. SHENKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
