Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler-Gulde v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:18cr00713-01.
as 4:2023cv02416
Petitioner:
MD Janis Jean Fowler-Gulde
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Fowler et al
as 7:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Aaron Brown
Defendant:
Dean Fowler, Lauren Parish, Lyle Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv02672
Petitioner:
Alan Patrick Fowler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fowler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01192
Petitioner:
Alan Patrick Fowler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gambill et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv01076
Defendant:
Rocky N. Moore, Virginia S. Stevens, Stephen Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio De Leon, Jesse Wade Holt, Mark Anthony Reyna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Fowler et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
NFN Halabeston, Larry Fowler, S.C.O. NFN Rackclift and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Fowler et al
as 4:2020cv01323
Plaintiff:
Corey Dewayne Tucker
Defendant:
Larry Fowler and Samuel Minnich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03982
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
David Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
