Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wimbush et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis Wimbush and Cowboy Dan's Trading Post & Pawn Shop
Defendant:
Detective Carter and Oak Grove Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campfield v. Nunley et al
as 4:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Kimberly Vick, Terry Nunley, William Dortch and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Campfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groves v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
M. Oerther, M. Cosgrove, Kentucky State Police Post 04 and others
Plaintiff:
Artavis Groves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Muhlenberg County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Terry Nunnely, Muhlenberg County Detention Center, Kellwell Food Service and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher David Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Oak Grove Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Christian County Circuit Court System, Oak Grove Police Department, Officer C. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Weaver et al
as 6:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Melvin Curtis
Defendant:
Michael Weaver, Rebecca Grove and Eddie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis v. Davis et al
as 6:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Melvin Curtis
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, Onuoha Jude, Aimee Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pollock v. Hart et al
as 4:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Messiah Pollock
Defendant:
DeEdra Hart, Alan Brown, Robert Henning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groves v. Sepanek
as 0:2014cv00103
Petitioner:
Steven H Groves
Respondent:
Michael Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tapp v. Wethington et al
as 4:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Darrell Tapp
Defendant:
Jay Wethington, Daviess County Detention Center, Chad E. Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
