Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv01151
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Johnson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, William L. Gibbons, Lee v. Coffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv01151
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Johnson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, William L. Gibbons, Lee v. Coffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coe v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv03006
Plaintiff:
Antraun Coe
Defendant:
United States of America, Myron Batts, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyons v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2016cv02451
Plaintiff:
Montreal Romarius Lyons
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Williams L. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Batts et al
as 2:2016cv02211
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Johnson
Defendant:
Myron Batts, D.R. Stephens, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2011cv02885
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County, City of Memphis, TN, William L. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2011cv02656
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County, City of Memphis, TN, William L. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2011cv02518
Plaintiff:
Richard Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
City of Memphis, County of Shelby, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Gibbons et al
as 2:2011cv02322
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Love
Defendant:
William L. Gibbons and Mary Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
