Cases 1 - 10 of 135
REYES v. R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07052
Petitioner:
MARTIN REYES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TACCETTA v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
MARTIN TACCETTA
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALENCIA v. WARDEN,
as 1:2023cv22338
Petitioner:
LUIS DAVID MARTIN VALENCIA
Respondent:
WARDEN,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv21017
Petitioner:
ROBERT H. MARTIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCGRATH v. BENTON et al
as 1:2023cv13006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGRATH, JR.
Defendant:
C.O. BENTON, C.O. HERNANDEZ, L.T. MARRUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILFORD v. KOPISTEKI et al
as 1:2023cv04461
Plaintiff:
LEWIS MILFORD
Defendant:
J. KOPISTEKI, NURSE HENSAN, ADMINISTRATOR MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTIN v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
as 1:2023cv04160
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTIN
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGARTH v. TURNER et al
as 1:2023cv03933
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGARTH
Defendant:
SIS TURNER, CASE MANAGER MCCOY, SIS VALASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCEDES v. IBENEME et al
as 2:2023cv03833
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO M MERCEDES
Defendant:
C. IBENEME, GROSSKOFF, RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CUMBERLAND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTIN
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, EUGENE CALDWELL, III, OFFICER WELCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
