Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PYLES v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PYLES and ANTHONY EUGENE PYLES
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Leon County Detention Facility
as 8:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pyles
Defendant:
Leon County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyle v. Randle, et al
as 3:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
William D Pyle
Defendant:
Randle, State of Florida, Florida D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PYLE v. RANDLE et al
as 3:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D PYLE
Defendant:
RANDLE, STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Pyle et al
as 2:2019cv00852
Defendant:
FNU Chavez, FNU Pyle, FNU Generale and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Henry Hayes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv00427
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
United States of America, J. Riffle, T. George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. STAFFORD
as 5:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JASON STAFFORD, FRANK TUBERVILLE and HARRY R PYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christie v. Lee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2010cv00420
Plaintiff:
Joyce Christie
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Office, Mike Scott, Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Mera et al
as 1:2007cv22577
Plaintiff:
Ariel A. Hernandez
Defendant:
Mera, Junior, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Mera et al
as 1:2007cv22665
Plaintiff:
Ariel A. Hernandez
Defendant:
Mera, Junior, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
