Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kurtz et al v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kurtz, T. KURTZ-SCHUMACHER and JESSICA APPLEGATE-BISHOP
Defendant:
The State of New York, AMERICAN MEDICAL ACADEMY, WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldrich v. Nettles et al
as 9:2023cv01283
Plaintiff:
Ryan Aldrich
Defendant:
C.O. David Nettles, C.O. Michael Schumacher, C.O. Christopher Stanzione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Schumacher et al
as 1:2023cv03634
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Andrews
Defendant:
William Schumacher, Michael Vitale and Matthew McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 9:2018cv00186
Defendant:
Alan Herdzik, C.O. Simmons, Stephen Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Annucci et al
as 6:2015cv06707
Plaintiff:
Steven Marshall
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Albert Prack, D. Venettozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2015cv06155
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, Jan Szablick, Jeffrey Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 6:2014cv06599
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Artus et al
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Armando Torres
Defendant:
Dale A. Artus, Thomas Sticht, Alan Herdzik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Selsky et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, Thomas Schoellkopf, G. Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Fischer et al
as 1:2008cv00699
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cole
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Robert Kirpatrick, Susan Schumacher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
