Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Dewayne Antwon Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. doing business as Donnell Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. corp. sole doing business as Donell Jr Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Thompson v. LNU
as 5:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Donell Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Tommy Thompson
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooks v. Thompson et al
as 5:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Cooks
Defendant:
Bobby Thompson, FNU Thompson and PCPSCT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Parker
as 4:2023cv00079
Petitioner:
Maurice L Thompson
Respondent:
David Parker and Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff in his Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Veech et al
as 4:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Thompson
Defendant:
Frank Veech, Sgt. JoJo Thornton and Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
