Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Johnathan R. Black
Defendant:
Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Barton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beyer v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Bryan Martin Beyer
Defendant:
Deschutes County, Michael Molan, Andrew Farey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v. Salem Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Ivan Cortes Rueda
Defendant:
Salem Hospital, Andrew J. Cleary, Corby W. Makin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratton v. Grasley et al
as 3:2023cv01894
Plaintiff:
Richard Stratton
Defendant:
Andrew Grasley and Nelson Ayala-Rubio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tindall-Martin v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01566
Petitioner:
Jayson Andrew Tindall-Martin
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Tsham et al
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Capt. Jeff Tsham, Dep. Susan Fleming, Lt. Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Garton et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Mark Garton, Kelvin Lowe, Jared Vorhees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stilson v. Grasley et al
as 3:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Max Dudley Stilson
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Barnes Grasley and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Grasley et al
as 3:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Barnes Grasley and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
