Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Carter v. Dailey et al
as 1:2021cv02325
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Carter
Defendant:
Dailey, Fox, Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv02053
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alexander, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkley v. Federal Court of Appeals
as 1:2019cv02245
Respondent:
Federal Court of Appeals
Petitioner:
Scott D. Barkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Santiago-Rodriguez v. Colorad Court of Appeals
as 1:2019cv01586
Plaintiff:
Victor Santiago-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Colorad Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Colorado Supreme Court et al
as 1:2018cv02043
Petitioner:
Dion P. Martinez
Respondent:
Colorado Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Henson et al
as 1:2018cv00324
Plaintiff:
Jada Davis
Defendant:
Patrick Henson, Stephen A. Groome, William Peal Alderton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engeman v. Mesa County District Court, CO et al
as 1:2017cv01839
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Engeman
Defendant:
Mesa County District Court, CO, Mesa County, CO, CO Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vianez v. Denver Court of Appeal et al
as 1:2016cv03081
Plaintiff:
Juan Vianez
Defendant:
Denver Court of Appeal, District Court for Denver, Hinkinlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. May et al
as 1:2015cv01570
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Frye
Defendant:
Daniel May, El Paso County District Court and Colorado Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Colorado Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
Gibson
Defendant:
Colorado Court of Appeals, Fremont County District Court, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
