Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cheever v. Glasser et al
as 6:2019cv01549
Defendant: Heidi Sternhagen, Ms. Burgess, Glasser and others
Plaintiff: Chad Adam Cheever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irwin v. Tapia et al
as 3:2019cv00675
Defendant: Sandy D. Tapia, Aramark Industries and Umatilla County Jail
Plaintiff: Matthew Shane Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Aramark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00025
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, Sandi Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff: David Ray Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01062
Defendant: Aramark Food Services Inc., Bill Brady and Eddie Climmer
Plaintiff: Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Umatilla County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01379
Defendant: Aramark Food Service, Stewart Harp, Thoren Hearn and others
Plaintiff: Shawn Howard Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00652
Defendant: Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Sr. Claims Examiner Therese Brady, Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Brent Evan Webster and Webster Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleon v. Marion County Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2008cv01153
Plaintiff: Xavier Juan Deleon
Defendant: Marion County Correctional Facility, Aramark Corporation and Beverly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Multnomah County Health et al
as 3:2008cv00607
Plaintiff: Richard Gerald Orr
Defendant: Mulntomah County Health, Aramark Corporation's Food Distributor, Multnomah County Inverness Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?