Cases 1 - 10 of 458
Tarter v. USA
as 1:2024cv01596
Petitioner:
Michael T. Tarter, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norris v. Watson
as 3:2024cv01444
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Petitioner:
Adam T. Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bragg v. Spatny
as 1:2024cv01388
Petitioner:
John T. Bragg
Respondent:
Warden Jerry Spatny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Mackey et al.
as 1:2024cv01215
Defendant:
Mr. Dunbar, Andrew Wheeler, Damon T. Hininger and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv01207
Petitioner:
Dashay T. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gillard v. Warden, Belmont County Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03695
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont County Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Michael T. Gillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry et al v. Foreman et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Warden Shelbie Smith, Annette Chambers-Smith, R. Battles and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry and Unamed Plaintiff(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelms v. USA
as 2:2024cv03218
Defendant:
Shawn T Nelms
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02837
Defendant:
BLAIR NANCE, MIKE E. MORGAN, Karen Phipps and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02835
Defendant:
MIKE E. MORGAN, Karen Phipps, BLAIR NANCE and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
