Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Alvarez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Luis Alvarez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00791
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Birruete v. Kelly
as 6:2021cv00932
Petitioner:
Alcibiades Birruete and Alcibiades Alvarez Birruete
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Larkin et al
as 2:2018cv00663
Defendant:
T. Alvarez, T. Bailey, Lieutenant Bauer and others
DRCI:
Deer Ridge Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez-Reyes v. Cain
as 2:2017cv00181
Petitioner:
Hugo Rufino Alvarez-Reyes
Unknown:
Lisa Hay
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez-Vega v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv02203
Petitioner:
Eduardo Alvarez-Vega
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Corizon Medical Health Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00971
Defendant:
Stephanie Alvarez, Corizon Medical Health Services, Inc., Jane Doe No. 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Henry Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lepez-Alvarez v. USA
as 3:2012cv01927
Petitioner:
Bulmaro Lepez-Alvarez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Guillen-Alvarez v. USA
as 3:2011cv70013
Petitioner:
Ricardo Guillen-Alvarez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ybarra v. Belleque
as 3:2008cv00848
Petitioner:
Adolfo Alvarez Ybarra
Respondent:
Brian Belleque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
