Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Joseph v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Jean Baptiste Joseph
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kirkland v. Danzig et al
as 8:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Steven Kirkland
Defendant:
David Danzig, Scot Peterson, Jennifer Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baptiste v. United States Of America
as 0:2023cv61635
Plaintiff:
Gary Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMPSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, JASON BRENES-CATINCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Baptiste et al
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Octavious Smith
Defendant:
Esdra Jean Baptiste, M.D., Nicolaus J. Kuen, M.D. and Reno Bertagnolli, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baptiste v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv21752
Plaintiff:
Samuel Baptiste
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THOMAS v. BILLY CLARK BAIL BONDS et al
as 3:2022cv02660
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE THOMAS
Defendant:
BILLY CLARK BAIL BONDS, BAPTIST HOSPITAL and BRIAN JAMMAL LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caleb v. Miami-Dade Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2021cv24456
Plaintiff:
Robert Caleb
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Corrections & Rehabilitation, A. Reed, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Baptiste v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv22483
Plaintiff:
Rillio Baptiste
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
