Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Bonner v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Alfred Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
John West, Asst Dir. Greg Martin, Dir. Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. B. Polleck
as 4:2023cv03743
Petitioner:
Ryan Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04133
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bonner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bonner v. AT&T Mobility Corporation
as 5:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Texas Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Public Safety, John West, Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
