Cases 1 - 10 of 46
BARKER v. R. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06432
Petitioner:
BRANDON EARL BARKER
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VILLAFANA v. BORETZ et al
as 2:2022cv06549
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
STACY BORITV, LAUREN BAYER, REGINA CAULFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv04624
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY WARDEN, MEDICAL STAFF and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv04296
Petitioner:
BRANDON GROCE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON v. MATTHEWS
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARCUS MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv20623
Plaintiff:
EMMALEE DENT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv16660
Plaintiff:
BRANDON GARDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2021cv15798
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JONES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, NAKIA BOWMAN, CONSOLATA MULLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 3:2020cv20424
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, ANTHONY DIPIETRO and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. ORTIZ
as 1:2020cv20127
Petitioner:
BRANDON ALLEN
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
