Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Michael N B Attaway and Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Mrs. Walker, Mr Logsdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant:
John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brough v. Gallaway et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brough
Defendant:
Warden Gallaway, C/O White, Lt. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. USA
as 2:2023cv02189
Petitioner:
Deangelo Terrell Banks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Niccolls v. March et al
as 3:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Justin Niccolls
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff Office, Jack Cambell, . March and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staake v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
Jared M Staake
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. PNC Bank et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Randy Powell
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01955
Petitioner:
Joseph Jose Banks
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
