Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gutierrez Reed et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Hanna Gutierrez Reed, Alec Baldwin and Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, FNU LNU and Michelle L. Grisham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Austin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00693
Respondent:
Eric Sutton, Jade Rotonda, E. Samuel and others
Petitioner:
LaMount Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnet v. LNU
as 1:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Clayton Landon Barnet, Wired Plastic Bank, Pay-Pal, Inc and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Margaret M Marriott, John M Marriott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 1:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Banks et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Branden Roberts
Defendant:
Allen Banks, C D Baker, D. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks v. New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute et al
as 1:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gordon Starks
Defendant:
New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, Mohammed Khafaja, Christa Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Martinez et al
as 1:2013cv01123
Plaintiff:
Gloria Nava, Athena Serrano and Rudolph Serrano
Defendant:
Susana Martinez, Kari Brandenberg, Lisa Trabaudo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Bank of America Corp. et al.
as 1:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
Bernard Madoff and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp., Merrill Lynch & Co., Kenneth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Aguirre v. Banks
as 1:2007cv01104
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rodriguez-Aguirre
Defendant:
Tereser A Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
