Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Bernards v. Prod Holding Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Bernards
Defendant:
Prod Holding Inc., Progressive Leasing LLC, Progressive Finance U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Key Bank & Accsets
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Johnny Curathus Murray
Defendant:
Key Bank & Accsets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollinquest v. Key Bank
as 6:2022cv01724
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Defendant:
Key Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jonathan Armand Harris
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Leah Lucas, Russell S. Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nickerson v. United States Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Dale Ray Nickerson
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration, The Federal Reserve Bank, Debbie April Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01259
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2018cv01464
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Michael Benanti
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Albina Bank
as 3:2018cv00009
Defendant:
Albina Bank
Plaintiff:
Melree Larea Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Myrick
as 6:2017cv02008
Petitioner:
Otha Lee Banks
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
