Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hubbert v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv14272
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Hubbert
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Ms. Barron, Mr. Kenny Brinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. Barron
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Sergio Antonio Hood
Defendant:
Officer Barron and FNU Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hood v. Barron
as 8:2023cv01524
Petitioner:
Sergio Antonio Hood
Defendant:
Officer Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barron-Salazar v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Juan Roberto Barron-Salazar
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv04296
Plaintiff:
BARRON ANDERSON
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holston v. English et al
as 2:2020cv14421
Defendant:
Sergeant Sellers, Nurse Romulus, A. Eschevarria and others
Plaintiff:
Reginal L. Holston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARRON v. MCNEIL
as 4:2020cv00358
Defendant:
WALT MCNEIL
Plaintiff:
JAMERIA D BARRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Barron's Wholesale Tire Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60068
Plaintiff:
Ingram and David C. Ingram
Defendant:
Barron's Wholesale Tire Inc, Barron's Wholesale Tire Inc. and Harleysville Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELICES v. INCH et al
as 3:2019cv00459
Defendant:
MARK INCH, ENGLISH, LOWERY and others
Plaintiff:
VILES DELICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenwade v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2017cv01036
Petitioner:
Barron Greenwade
Respondent:
State of Florida, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
