Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Garnett v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Barron Garnett
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Jerome Combs Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv06390
Plaintiff:
Sergio Barron
Defendant:
David Brown, Kim Fox, Loukas Kalliantasis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv02529
Petitioner:
Joshua Paul Barron
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore et al v. C.C.D.O.C et al
as 1:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Dennis Moore, Deandre Barron and Napoleon Jackson
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C, Tom Dart and Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. C.C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Jackson, Dennis Moore and Deandre Barron
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C. and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron v. Sandage
as 1:2021cv01008
Respondent:
Jon Sandage
Petitioner:
Christopher Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sandoval, Sr. et al v. Rockford Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv50207
Defendant:
Justin Graceffa, Rockford Police Department, Sgt. K. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sandoval, Jr., Michael Sandoval, Sr. and Anthony Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2020cv50021
Defendant:
Prison Officials, Dixon Corr. Ctr., Amber Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Shaver et al
as 3:2019cv50081
Defendant:
Todd Shaver, Bradley Barron, Doug Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Quinn v. Lashbrook
as 3:2018cv02013
Defendant:
J. Lashbrook, C/O Theis, C/O Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
