Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BARROW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 9:2024cv80705
Plaintiff:
MARK BARROW
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARROW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
MARK BARROW
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION et al
as 3:2023cv16482
Plaintiff:
DARIO M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION, BABECOCK, BAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boobyyaa v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Mandingo Boobyyaa and Keith Mason
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, T. Campbell, Major Dedge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya Cruz et al v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv20314
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Amaya Cruz, Christian Pallidine and Angel Jae Torres Bucci
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Daniel Junior, Captain J Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. American Civil Liberty Union et al
as 1:2021cv24203
Plaintiff:
Dario Micheal Rodriguez, David, Darius and others
Defendant:
American Civil Liberty Union, John Doe, Georgetown University Law Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Barrows et al
as 2:2018cv14460
Defendant:
Supervisor Peter Keisler, Sergeant Fernandez, Captain Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Dario M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv23292
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barrow
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barrow v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv20339
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barrow
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barrow v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv20615
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barrow
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
