Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AZCONA v. CENTRAL OFFICE OF NW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
CENTRAL OFFICE OF NW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INVESTIGATOR MERRINGTON, OFC. PROTYNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHLEY GEORGES v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv05559
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LESLIE RUSSELL, OFFICER FRONDUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREENY v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv18278
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY, ERIC FAGEN, JOHN DOE #5 and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FREENY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv13395
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BRIGGS v. BECKER et al
as 1:2018cv16773
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRIGGS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, MT EPHRAIM POLICE DEPARTMENT and PTL BECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv08618
Plaintiff:
IVAN MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, BAEZ, BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BACON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2010cv05484
Plaintiff:
JOEL JERMAINE BACON
Defendant:
ELIZABETH BURNS, GREG LOCK, GWENDYLN GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
